home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- > On Tue, 16 Jan 1996, Magnus Kollberg wrote:
- >
- > > > > Okey, but the 320x200 resolution with an 160x200 view that I used takes more
- > > > > bandwidth than a real 160x200 so it will maybe compensate each other, or?
- > > >
- > > > Nope, same bandwidth. The system time earned is the time it takes to
- > > > _calculate_ half the graphics.
- > >
- > > Argghh... it's never like you want it to be. :-(((
- > > Another thought about using 160x200, the status bar will not be so pretty
- > > either, but maybe we can use the whole screen. :-)
- >
- > You can use 320x200 for the status bar. Because the RESOLUTION SET is
- > 320x200. 160x200 is only a locical concept where you use long to update
- > graphics instead of word.
-
- Okeydokey... this was more complicated than I thought. :-)
- Can't we use dithering and make it run in a GEM window too? This would be nice
- and it was possible with the old c-version, DVIEW. ;-)
-
- //Magnus Kollberg
-
-